|
Triple-Hot-Film Anemometer Performance In CASES-99 And A Comparison To Sonic
Anemometer Measurements
by Brian T. Skelly, David R. Miller, and Thomas H. Meyer
(submitted to Boundary-Layer Meteorology - January 2002)
Abstract: Two levels of triple-hot-film and sonic anemometers were deployed on a 5.5
m tower during the Cooperative Atmospheric Surface Exchange Study (CASES-99)
in October 1999. Each triple-hot-film probe was collocated 5 cm from the
sonic sensing path on a common boom. This paper examines the performance
of the triple-hot-films. Various problems with using triple-hot-films in
the atmosphere to resolve wind components are addressed including the derivation
of a yaw angle correction using the collocated sensors. It was found that
output voltage drift due to changes in environmental temperature could
be monitored and corrected using an automated system. Non-unique solutions
to heat transfer equations can be resolved using a collocated sonic anemometer.
Multi-resolution decomposition (MR) of the hot-film data was used to estimate
appropriate day and night averaging periods for turbulent flux measurements
in and near the roughness sub-layer. Finally, triple-hot-film measurements
of mean wind vector magnitudes (M), turbulent kinetic energies (TKE), sensible
heat fluxes (H), and local friction velocities (u*) are compared to those
of the collocated CSAT3 sonic anemometers. Overall, the mean wind vector
magnitudes measured by the triple-hot-film and the collocated sonic sensors
were close, consistent and independent of stability or proximity to the
ground. The turbulent statistics, TKE, u*, and H, measured by the two sensor
systems were reasonably close together at z = 5 m. However, the ratio of
sonic measurement hot-film measurement (MCSAT3/MHOT-FILM)
decreased toward the ground surface, especially during stable conditions. |